In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >On 2002.02.13 13:52 Ian Schmidt wrote: > >[BIG SNIP] >> To put this back on topic, I don't see any immediate benefits from a LGPL >> >> license. If we knew what the threat to Wine Jeremy hinted at was, it >> might >> make for a more informed discussion. I also liked Gav's idea about >> WineCorp >> a lot as a compromise, and I'd love to see more dicussion of that and >> less >> licensing flaming. >> > >Agreed. In my private mail to Alexandre I mentioned that we need some >sort of "Wine Foundation". Apparently Gav has the same idea and at least >one other person (you) seems to like it too.
I would really like _this_ part of the thread to continue too (*), with comments from Codeweavers, and some of the other wine heavies perhaps guiding 'us' with their insights. Bob Hall (lurker :-) ) * (and other licence issues to be continued elsewhere, preferably off- list) -- robert w hall