On Tuesday 19 November 2002 12:09 pm, Vincent Béron wrote: > Greg Turner a écrit: > > Actually, I have similar questions about the programs and dlls > > trees of wine... for example, Alexandre has requested that I remove > > #ifdef's from rpcss... but can I safely code against the assumption > > that defined(NO_NAMELESS_STRUCT)? The answer (or, more precisely, > > the ability to answer for myself without bothering you all about > > it) lies in knowing what the "officially" supported usage scenarios > > for the rpcss code are... but I'm not sure I do. > > DEFS = @DLLFLAGS@ -DSTRICT -DNONAMELESSUNION > -DNONAMELESSSTRUCT $(EXTRADEFS) > > in Makeprogs.rules.in should answer one of your questions. > > Vincent
that is clear, indeed, but what I don't know is, should I be worried that somebody is compiling, say, under MSVC, completely outside of the control of the wine configure/make, where, in fact, !defined(NONAMELESSSTRUCT) && !defined(NONAMELESSUNION)...? -- gmt "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight; nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety; is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better persons than himself." -- John Stuart Mill