Tony Lambregts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually Alexandre hasn't commented on it, so if it doesn't bit rot it > still could be commited. However, at the time, there were some > negative comments about it. It seems that the major concern is that > it should do more than it does.
Well, yes, if we really need to change the fstype it should be a generic option that allows all types to be specified, not just NTFS. And it shouldn't overload the existing "type" parameter, it should be a separate entry. But it may be enough to simply always return FAT32, if that works for the app in question. Returning NTFS is a bit misleading anyway since we don't implement any of the NTFS-specific features. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
