Re: New conformance test for user32.dll

[Tony Lambregts]

Ferenc Wagner wrote:

Tony Lambregts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 

The patch is still in the wrong format. New files need to
be diff'ed against /dev/null.
   

Thanks for the clarification!  Winehq says new files can be
included as separate attachments.  Well, this is exactly one
kind of problems/comments I expected for first contribution.
I'm sorry, It looks like I am incorrect. It seems I am so used to seeing 
new files diff'ed that I assumed that was the prefered way.  Unless 
Alexandre says he prefers one way or the other I guess I will leave the 
documentation the way it is.

Also, I found no mention of license info on the web page.

Well this makes Alexandre's job easier. It also makes it clear who owns 
copyright and what is permitted/required.

I Cc-ed the devel list so that someone can fix the docs.

 

Does anyone want me to put together a patch?

--

Tony Lambregts