"Kevin Groeneveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is my first attempt at a conformance test for the BuildCommDCB > functions. It does not cover very many cases yet, but I thought I would > post what I have so far in case I am going about this the wrong way. > > I compiled this with MSVC and it ran with no errors on both Windows 95 > and Windows 2000.
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > CTESTS = \ > alloc.c \ > atom.c \ > + build_dcb.c \ Looks good. The only suggestion I have is to rename build_dcb.c to comm.c in order to collect all future communication API tests in that file. -- Dmitry.