Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Likewise, the Japanese sample text only has Aa (and not AaBb) of > Romanji (latin characters). For similar reasons, I left AaBb in place > (why remove it?).
The question should be why do we go to the trouble of having parts of the string handled in two different places, when we could simply store the full string in the sample text array. It would make the code simpler, more flexible, and more compatible. Is there a good reason for doing it the way it is now? -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
