On Sunday 19 September 2004 14:43, Robert Shearman wrote: > No. I am asking whether it will end up sitting there remaining 5% > implemented (I think the 25% on the DLLs status page is a little > generous) because no-one will have the time and expertise to implement > the rest. Admittedly, this is different from SHDOCVW where it consists > of many undocumented functions and interfaces.
I don't think it's that bad with MSCMS. It's pretty well documented, ICC profiles are standardized and LittleCMS appears to supply at least the basic functionality that I suspect most apps are after, which is translating an image from one color space into another. -Hans