Mike Hearn wrote:
For what it's worth I don't think we should start excluding new DLLs from the tree until they reach maturity (what is mature anyway?). If they aren't in there people probably won't hack on them.
The flip side is then we end up with a ton of stub DLLs and programs that could work in its absence now break. This is a danger whenever you add stubs, it's happened with function stubs as well.
Also maybe these DLLs can Just be excluded from the "make Install". There should be 2 DLL templates (in Makfile) one for installable DLL and one for not-installable. The packagers should make it a rule to only include Installable DLLs.
