Scott Ritchie wrote:
After talking in the chatroom setup by Google, here's what I was able to
glean:
1) We don't need to form a formal "mentoring organization" as Google
calls it right now, since someone from Google (by the name of "Dan") has
volunteered to process the Wine applications. That's how we got listed
on the projects page. I have no idea if he is an actual Wine developer,
was at WineConf, or what, but either way he's our "mentoring
organization" for the moment
Dan has asked us, the Wine Project, to help him come up with a list
of good projects. I'm responding to his request for help.
I don't think we need a 501(c) organization to do this; I think
Dimi can do it all <grin>. Seriously, I think we have plenty
of volunteers to give Dan the idea set he needs, and we have
a very nice criteria for completion - a commit by Alexandre.
Dimi, my issue is that I don't think we want to set the bar
too low. I don't think an easy integration project is
appropriate. Maybe I'm wrong, but I at least think it would
be cool if these led to some very meaningful and truly
useful improvements to Wine, and perhaps to a new talented
student getting hooked on Wine.
Cheers,
Jeremy
