On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:04:40PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: > Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >Changelog: > >* Makes RPCRT4 use Winsock2 instead of native sockets (needed for > >event object support) > >* Adds support for TCP (ncacn_ip_tcp protocol) servers > > I appreciate your attempt at solving this hard problem, but I don't > believe this is the right approach. Using winsock2 instead of Unix > sockets adds overhead in terms of wineserver calls and extra processing > time to mangle arguments, which we shouldn't need.
But shouldn't we have the possibility to use winsock so a build of our RPCRT4 is possible for native (and e.g. ros)? Jan
