Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'll have a look.
How do yo want to report a missing test? In the normal report file? If
that's the case we should also change the dissect/gather scripts:
It has to be part of the report data, so yes the scripts probably need
to be updated.
If this thing works out, should we change the old tests back or use
this new approach only for new (and currently failing) dll's?
If it simplifies the code we can certainly change the old tests too.
Hi,
a patch somewhat like this?
diff --git a/programs/winetest/main.c b/programs/winetest/main.c
index f743ffc..3c4846d 100644
--- a/programs/winetest/main.c
+++ b/programs/winetest/main.c
@@ -433,6 +433,24 @@ extract_test_proc (HMODULE hModule, LPCTSTR lpszType,
LPTSTR lpszName, LONG_PTR lParam)
{
const char *tempdir = (const char *)lParam;
+ char dllname[MAX_PATH];
+ HMODULE dll;
+
+ /* Check if the main dll is present on this system */
+ strcpy(dllname, lpszName);
+ *strstr(dllname, "_TEST.EXE") = 0;
+
+ dll = LoadLibrary(dllname);
+ if (!dll) {
+ /* Here we add some information to the results file
+ * that indicates that the dll is not present
+ * on this platform.
+ */
+ report (R_WARNING, "dll : %s is not present", dllname);
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+ FreeLibrary(dll);
+
get_subtests( tempdir, &wine_tests[nr_of_files], lpszName );
nr_of_tests += wine_tests[nr_of_files].subtest_count;
nr_of_files++;
Running this on win9x gives me 13 dll's that are not available (the R_WARNING is
of course only for testing).
Cheers,
Paul.
