Hi Jan, Jan Zerebecki schreef: > I agree the wine- prefix should be removed. > > Currently we have quite some categories where I don't really know > how they are defined, so the description should be enhanced so > there is no confusion over what goes in them. > > Currently we have some categories that exactly fit to one dll and > some categories that include multiple dlls that are related. Also > there is overlap between those two. (And perhaps some that fit in > neither.) > > E.g. there is wine-quartz (one dll dlls/quartz/ ) and > wine-directx-dshow (includes dlls/{quartz,msdmo,qcap}/ ). > I believe wine-quartz is meant for dlls/winequartz.drv, which is the mac os x quartz driver. > The best is probably to have no overlap and have multi-dll/path > categories contain the shell-glob of path/files that it contains. > > I think in some cases multi-dll categories are preferable to > single-dlls ones. A even better example for this than dshow is > wine-directx-d3d, where before the bug is fixed it might not be > easily known if it is in d3d9 or wined3d and a bug might exist in > the same way in more than one d3d version. > > >From previous discussions on irc I know some people want to have > a radical one category per dll approach, please speak up now. > I'm against specific dll components, if you report a bug it could be a series of dlls, so something like direct3d would be better then wined3d, d3d9, d3d8, d3d7.
Cheers, Maarten.