On 10/11/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/11/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/11/07, Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mi, 2007-10-10 at 15:20 -0500, James Hawkins wrote: > > > > > > > wine-gdi-(printing) -> gdi > > > > > > This is a bad Idea. > > > We have a lot of different dlls related to printing: > > > > > > comdlg32.dll > > > compstui.dll > > > gdi32.dll > > > localspl.dll > > > printui.dll > > > shell32.dll > > > wineps.drv > > > winspool.drv > > > > > > I vote for "printing" next to "gdi" > > > > > > > What's wrong with having a new printing component? Lumping *all* > > gdi/printing bugs into gdi-(printing) is a bad idea. > > > > -- > > James Hawkins > > > > > > > > > How about "gdi-printing" and "gdi-video"? >
No, because not all printing problems are gdi, and if you don't have gdi-printing, there's no need for gdi-video; just plain gdi works. The same argument goes for gdi-video. So, we should have: gdi printing and any bugs that are marked as wine-gdi-(printing) should be set to one or the other. -- James Hawkins
