On Dec 15, 2007 11:27 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Hawkins wrote: > > On Dec 15, 2007 11:02 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > >>> Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl -> > >>> opengl32, > >>> wine-user -> user32 > >>> > >> Why do you want "32" at the end? Also note that opengl32 is a thunk dll. > >> Most of it's code somewhere else. > >> > > > > It's consistent with the policy: one component per module reported. > > What do you have against the 32? As opengl32 is a thunk, there > > shouldn't be any bug reports attributed to that component, and the > > component shouldn't exist. I'm fine with an opengl keyword if people > > want it, but as you said, the bug lies elsewhere. > > > Assigning openGL bugs to user32 or gdi32 doesn't make it any more clear > where the problem is. Because in most case that would be somewhere between > x11drv, gdi32, user32. There are lots of examples like that all over the > place. Don't forget who designed all this... hm not even sure there was any > designs actually. Hard assigning bugs to the dll won't make it any better > then too generic categories like we have now. > > >>> Add gdi32, ntdll, oleaut32, rpcrt4 and any other missing DLL component. > >>> > >> No, please do not add all dlls, listed are fine. That will create huge > >> clutter. Lets do it one at a time, whenever we need it. > >> > > > > I'm fine with waiting for the report to add components, but there are > > bug reports now that need components that do not exist. > > > Then please list them. >
As Dmitry already said: ntdl, oleaut32, rpcrt4. Searching through bugzilla: wininet, wintrust, secur32, advpack, hhctrl, imagehlp, mshtml, shlwapi, urlmon. There are probably more, but that's a good starter list. -- James Hawkins