On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:18:11 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Kai Blin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's a category for secur32, called wine-sspi for now. As Microsoft > > calls the whole GSSAPI clone implemented in secur32 and possibly > > additional dlls SSPI, it makes sense to call the bugzilla component that > > way. > > sspi consists of at least a host and many security provider dlls, which by > itself tells nothing to a user, or a developer who tries to fix a bug where > to look for a problem: all of the sspi dlls? some specific dll, provider? > somewhere else?
IIRC there are five providers that Win2k and WinXP ship, all of them implemented in secur32.dll. I don't see how renaming the component will create less confusion for the developers. However, I'm not feeling strong enough about this to really care. If the wine- prefix is removed, I need to adapt my email filters anyway. :) Cheers, Kai -- Kai Blin WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/ Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/ -- Will code for cotton.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
