On Jan 14, 2008 11:13 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2008 5:41 AM, Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But I was only referring to the tests that fail on Wine; there, > > > we have control over both the test and the code, so if > > > we can't get those tests passing, we're pretty weak :-) > > > > But if you fix a test failure in Wine that is failing on Windows, then > > you are introducing a bug in Wine. > > When fixing those 5 - 10 tests on Wine, one should also > make sure they work on Windows. > > > I like the idea of getting the tests passing on Windows XP (SP2?) - > > that will then be the baseline for Wine. This should not cause > > regressions on other versions of Windows. > > Yep. And at some point we should indeed make Windows XP > the default personality in Wine. Seems like a 1.0 kind of thing. > - Dan >
Is there a reason there isn't a Linux column on that giant test.wine list? -- Zachary Goldberg Computer Science & Engineering Electrical Captain of Penn Electric Race Team School of Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania