On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Cesar Izurieta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 March 2008 17:21:20 Austin English wrote: > > > > > An option yes, but it should not be the default course of action. As > > > Rahyen said, a predictable order should be used, and when there are > > > conflicts, pick the first in that order for presentation through the > > > FUSE system. User can then rename files/delete files to get the one > > > they want (or if possible, have a configuration menu to adjust chosen > > > file order/allow exceptions, etc.). > >
Wouldn't it make the most sense to use whichever one was modified last? In most cases. that gives you the right response, eg. you put in a modified executable via patch or similar, and want it to use that version. [snip]