2008/10/8 Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > per dan resending > > > chris > > From e8ec03471e1206ea93fa6224d7c6b8b61422d80e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:02:36 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Checked all the states of variables in test to ensure that > they are not NULL >
This broad-sweep approach is not correct. If there is a machine that is crashing on a NULL interface, then a check needs to be added where that machine returns a NULL interface and we should then skip those particular tests. There are plenty of examples of this you can look for. -- James Hawkins
