On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > It was not a broad sweep... I know where it crashed and am checking there. > However, I noticed there were several other places were at sometimes it > checked for null and other places it did not.. so I went > through and made sure all of the ones without the check now have the check. >
Your patch added 85 checks, which is a broad sweep, which is why it was rejected. Repeating myself, if there is any specific place where we get a NULL interface in Windows, then we should have already handled it and done a skip before we ever got to the release. If not, then that handling should be added. -- James Hawkins
