On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Pete Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It does match the style of the way that HeapAlloc is used elsewhere in the > file, though not malloc admittedly. I wasn't sure which convention had > precedent. >
Please bottom-post when replying to a post on the wine lists. There is one test function that uses a space after opening parentheses, but it's the exception, not the rule. > I'm afraid that I don't understand how my changelog doesn't match the > patch. I'm new here, can you help me out? There's obviously something I'm > missing! > You had several 'changelog' entries in the email, but the last one was Changelog: * malloc calls in dlls/kernel32/process.c have been change to HeapAlloc which does not match the patch. -- James Hawkins
