2008/10/30 James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Pete Myers > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It does match the style of the way that HeapAlloc is used elsewhere in the > > file, though not malloc admittedly. I wasn't sure which convention had > > precedent. > > > > Please bottom-post when replying to a post on the wine lists. There > is one test function that uses a space after opening parentheses, but > it's the exception, not the rule.
Sure, I'll be more careful about both of those in future. > > I'm afraid that I don't understand how my changelog doesn't match the > > patch. I'm new here, can you help me out? There's obviously something I'm > > missing! > > > > You had several 'changelog' entries in the email, but the last one was > > Changelog: > * malloc calls in dlls/kernel32/process.c have been change to HeapAlloc > > which does not match the patch. That was a dumb mistake, caused by copying and pasting from a different patch. Thanks for your help James, I'll try and fix the patch then resubmit. Pete Myers