"Austin English" <austinengl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Vitaliy Margolen > <wine-de...@kievinfo.com> wrote: >> Austin English wrote: >>> In an effort to remove the CVS/GIT tag, I was going to go through and >>> start changing the versions based on when the bug was filed. I.e., >>> look at when 1.1.10 was out, and any bugs filed in those dates with >>> CVS/GIT tag get moved to 1.1.10. I'm thinking of starting with 0.9, as >>> anything before that is _really_ old and not worth the effort... >> Agreed. Non need to generate huge volume of spam changing all the old >> versions. Especially for closed bugs. > > Well, they all have to be moved so we can delete that version. I meant > that anything that was before 0.9 will be labeled as 0.9.
I'd suggest to replace CVS/GIT tag in existing bugs buy "unknown" and ask the reporter to fix it (as I initially suggested when I proposed to get rid CVS/GIT tag). -- Dmitry.