On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov <dmi...@codeweavers.com> wrote: > "Austin English" <austinengl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Vitaliy Margolen >> <wine-de...@kievinfo.com> wrote: >>> >>> Austin English wrote: >>>> >>>> In an effort to remove the CVS/GIT tag, I was going to go through and >>>> start changing the versions based on when the bug was filed. I.e., >>>> look at when 1.1.10 was out, and any bugs filed in those dates with >>>> CVS/GIT tag get moved to 1.1.10. I'm thinking of starting with 0.9, as >>>> anything before that is _really_ old and not worth the effort... >>> >>> Agreed. Non need to generate huge volume of spam changing all the old >>> versions. Especially for closed bugs. >> >> Well, they all have to be moved so we can delete that version. I meant >> that anything that was before 0.9 will be labeled as 0.9. > > I'd suggest to replace CVS/GIT tag in existing bugs buy "unknown" and > ask the reporter to fix it (as I initially suggested when I proposed > to get rid CVS/GIT tag). > > -- > Dmitry. >
I was attempting to avoid more bugzilla e-mails to set the version, and considering that most people won't know the version that they were using that long ago, it's at most a futile effort. Either way's fine with me, I'd just like to eliminate the version tag so we can quit getting 'CVS/GIT is deprecated e-mails'. -- -Austin