Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Alexandre Julliard wrote: >>> Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> So that means bug 14850 needs to be reopened with a link to 13995? >>> No, if it's the same bug it should be a single report. If .NET doesn't >>> install then obviously all apps that try to install it will be broken, >>> it doesn't make sense to create a separate bug for each app that suffers >>> from the problem. >>> >> Only a comment will not increase the 'popularity' of a bug though. How >> do we determine the priority of such a bug? (Or don't we deal with >> priorities anyway?). > > We don't really, and a separate bug which will be closed as duplicate > wouldn't help anyway. If there is evidence that it affects a lot of apps > you can make the severity major. > OK, fair enough.
I'll just have this already existing bug linked to from the appdb then. -- Cheers, Paul.