2009/4/9 Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com>: > (This was last discussed in February, e.g. > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html ) > > The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one > would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress. > > I can think of two sources of noise: > 1) 32 and 64 bit results are mixed together > 2) we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines > running the tests > > Removing these two sources of noise might be as simple as > 1) omit 64 bit results, and
Not a bad idea, but I would suggest classifying these machines as a different category (I would suggest "other" for the moment) rather than omitting the results. > 2) omit computers for which results are not > consistently available throughout the time range > being displayed > > Shouldn't be too hard for someone to whip together an > alternate report that did that. Wish I had the time to... -- Rob Shearman
