On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Stefan Dösinger wrote: [...] > So you mean keeping the existing infrastructure around just for midi > and have something entirely different for the rest of the audio > features?
That might nt be too bad in that we could still drop all the current current winmm audio backends that don't support Midi. At first glance: wineaudioio, wineesd, winejack, and winenas. So we'd just keep the Midi portion of winealsa, winecoreaudio and wineoss. -- Francois Gouget <fgou...@free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ $live{free} || die "";