Francois Gouget wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
[...]
So you mean keeping the existing infrastructure around just for midi
and have something entirely different for the rest of the audio
features?
That might nt be too bad in that we could still drop all the current
current winmm audio backends that don't support Midi. At first glance:
wineaudioio, wineesd, winejack, and winenas. So we'd just keep the Midi
portion of winealsa, winecoreaudio and wineoss.
Can we drop all current audio drivers now that don't have midi?
Any driver that doesn't implement the complete winmm API and
direct sound shouldn't be in the current tree anyway.
