> > > The compatibility information basically indicates that Mono can substitute > > for .NET below version 3.0. 3.0 and higher still needs Microsoft's > > implementation. > > How would you handle hybridizing Mono with Microsoft's framework? > > You would need different wine prefixes if you want to use both at once. > > What is the problem with 3.0, and can't it be fixed? > >
AFAIK mono doesn't implement WPF, so any .NET app that uses it is likely to fail in mono. Correct me if i'm wrong Vincent Povirk <madewokherd+8cd9 <at> gmail.com> writes: