On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/6/30 <wy...@volny.cz>: >>> Ok, try with a modified header: >>> >> >> OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug >> in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years >> ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty >> commit even though it was covered by several other faulty commits >> etc. >> >> I think I can find a problem between patches quite well. I can't go >> under "patch level" aka go into lines of code and that's the helping >> hand i would need here, i.e. i know, that 3rd patch of your series >> makes troubles to me and i also know, that your one big merged and >> modified patch works for me. Unfortunately as i said, i can't search >> a regression between lines of code. And this is a place we should >> look in, i guess... >> >> Sure, i will try again your modified script later today and let you >> know. >> >> For the other guys, could i call for help?? Could you please try to >> apply the Vincas's 9 patch raw-input series to the current git, try >> to compile and let me know, if you succeed? I really would like to >> know if i'm the only one with such problem. >> >> Thank you all, >> W. > > $ cd wine-git > $ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch > $ patch -p1 < raw.patch > $ ./tools/make_requests > $ ./configure > $ make > > works here: > austin@debian:~/wine-git$ cat /etc/issue > Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid \n \l > > austin@debian:~/wine-git$ uname -a > Linux debian 2.6.39-2-686-pae #1 SMP Wed Jun 8 11:33:14 UTC 2011 i686 > GNU/Linux > > -- > -Austin
Wylda already reported that this big patch worked, but the 9-patch series didn't. Can you try those?