* On Mon, 2 Jan 2012, Dan Kegel wrote: > > If an app stops working because some missing feature is added to an > existing DLL, it should not be tagged as a regression even though it is > from the app's point of view, right? > (Thinking of the installers for Photoshop CS3 and Visual Studio 2005.) > I wonder if we need a separate keyword for that, like 'appregression'.
I would call it 'newfeature' or even 'weaknewfeature' to avoid similarity between sound of 'regression' and 'appregression'. S.
