On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 01:10, Saulius Krasuckas <sauli...@ar.fi.lt> wrote: > * On Mon, 2 Jan 2012, Dan Kegel wrote: >> >> If an app stops working because some missing feature is added to an >> existing DLL, it should not be tagged as a regression even though it is >> from the app's point of view, right? >> (Thinking of the installers for Photoshop CS3 and Visual Studio 2005.) >> I wonder if we need a separate keyword for that, like 'appregression'. > > I would call it 'newfeature' or even 'weaknewfeature' to avoid similarity > between sound of 'regression' and 'appregression'.
I don't think it's a common enough occurrence to warrant a keyword. -- -Austin
