On 06/06/12 11:52, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> writes: > >> This usage of list is broken here as well. list_init should be called >> before list_add_head (so calling it early in initialization code will >> fix both problems). > There's no reason to call list_init on list entries, it should only be > called on the actual list.
Oh, right, sorry for misleading. I made wrong assumptions looking at the patch. Jacek
