On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:56:06AM +0200, Jacek Caban wrote: > On 06/06/12 11:52, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> writes: > > > >> This usage of list is broken here as well. list_init should be called > >> before list_add_head (so calling it early in initialization code will > >> fix both problems). > > There's no reason to call list_init on list entries, it should only be > > called on the actual list. > > Oh, right, sorry for misleading. I made wrong assumptions looking at the > patch.
So, Alexandre, is my patch right or wrong? And if wrong, can you quickly fix it:) Ciao, Marcus
