Vincent Povirk <madewokh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I disagree with many of the choices in this series (for example, I > think casting an interface pointer to an inherited interface is fine, > and replacing that with QueryInterface just adds unnecessary > additional logic), but I don't think any semantics have been changed > and overall it's a good cleanup.
Please also consider that many of the objects may be implemented by a someone's else codec dll, and relying on an implementation detail is not acceptable in that case. -- Dmitry.
