2013/1/14 Nikolay Sivov <bungleh...@gmail.com>: > It's a way it's used in ListView_SetIconSpacing() (which could be broken in > its own way of course). > I think it's ok to ignore this 64 bit case for now, especially while we > don't get daily test runs.
Are you saying that I should drop this? - return LISTVIEW_SetIconSpacing(infoPtr, (short)LOWORD(lParam), (short)HIWORD(lParam)); + if(lParam == -1) + return LISTVIEW_SetIconSpacing(infoPtr, -1, -1); + return LISTVIEW_SetIconSpacing(infoPtr, LOWORD(lParam), HIWORD(lParam)); This would net us 2 more todo_wine tests. Also, what's up with the daily test runs? Will they be fixed any time soon?