On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Henri Verbeet wrote: > On 23 February 2013 17:20, Henri Verbeet <hverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Personally, I suspect the test is just overly restrictive. > > Also, just to clarify something, initially on IRC I was under the > impression the driver *only* exposed X1R5G5B5, i.e. instead of > X8R8G8B8, while clearly supporting 32 bpp display modes.
Yes, that's probably my fault as that's what I believed too initially. But I have since run tests to list all the supported format and QXL exposes both X1R5G5B5 and X8R8G8B8: http://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=243&log_103=1#k103 -- Francois Gouget <fgou...@codeweavers.com>
