> > > > if (sm > 2) handle instruction length > > else if (comment or def instruction) special handling for them > > else skip DWORD with bit 31 set > > > > Is this correct? > > > > SM >= 2 for the instruction length case, but apart from that it should be > good. > > Oups. Tipo. It's what I meant.
Ideally we'd use some tests, as Henri suggested, but that's not > blocking this patch I think. > I'll try to add some of them for that case. > >
