Hi Joe, Could you look into Adam's issue with your package?
Adam, Can you provide the full output of whatever is behind "warning: %post(wireguard-dkms-1:0.0.20170629-2.fc25.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 1"? Is there a debug switch to get more verbose logs? Why not install this directly from copr? Additionally, why are you installing 0629? That package is very old. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jdoss/wireguard/ Jason On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:58 PM, adam souzis <a...@souzis.com> wrote: > > I've been impressed with Wireguard, its design has helped simplify the > implementation of a distributed sandbox app I am building quite a bit. But I > have had mixed results getting it running on different distributions. > > The good news is that I can report that I was able to build, install and run > Wireguard on CoreOs. > > The bad news is I was unable to get Wireguard working on either CentOS 7, > Fedora 26 or Fedora 25 (running these on AWS), it doesn't appear to be > installing the kernel module properly. > > Here's what I see when install the RPM: > > + dkms add -m wireguard -v 0.0.20170629 -q --rpm_safe_upgrade > > + dkms build -m wireguard -v 0.0.20170629 -q > > + dkms install -m wireguard -v 0.0.20170629 -q > > D: %post(wireguard-dkms-1:0.0.20170629-2.fc25.noarch): waitpid(14760) rc > 14760 status 100 > > warning: %post(wireguard-dkms-1:0.0.20170629-2.fc25.noarch) scriptlet failed, > exit status 1 > > Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package wireguard-dkms > > > Looks like it might have worked: > > [fedora@ip-1~]$ sudo dkms status > > wireguard, 0.0.20170629: added > > BUT: > > [fedora@ip-1 ~]$ sudo ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard > > RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported > > I tried this on the latest version of the RPM and this earlier version. I > also tried compiling it from source on Fedora but make failed early on. > > I disabled selinux, verified the kernel config is good and manually enabled > udp_tunnel for good measure. Any other suggestions? (I did see an earlier > post here recommending using kernel-ml for centos 7 but I need to use the > Atomic Host variant and swapping out the kernel on that is non-trivial. I was > hoping using a recent Fedora would solve the kernel compatibility issues.) > > thank you! > Adam > ᐧ > > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard > _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
