On 08/09/2017 07:39 AM, adam souzis wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for looking into this, yes you are correct that my machine's
kernel version didn't match with what the rpm expected, I discovered
this when I tried to build from source. Maybe this error should be fatal
or output a message suggesting the expected kernel?
I am not sure how must effort that will require. If anyone has any ideas
on how to make this edge case better I am all ears.
For the time being, just ensure you have the right kernel-headers
installed for your running kernel and you should be fine.
Have you tried to get your packages to working on an Atomic Host build?
When I did, the install failed:
[fedora@atomic~]$ uname -r
4.11.11-300.fc26.x86_64
[fedora@atomic~]$ sudo rpm-ostree install
./wireguard-dkms-0.0.20170726-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
Checking out tree 0715ce8... done
Resolving dependencies... done
Overlaying... done
*error: *Running %post for wireguard-dkms: Executing
bwrap(/usr/wireguard-dkms.post): Child process exited with code 8
So I just copied the wireguard.ko and wg binaries over from a regular
Fedora 26, did an insmod and things are working, so I'm good for now.
If I get some time I will ask the folks in #atomic what the best method
is for adjusting a F26 RPM to work in Atomic. My hunch it is failing
when it tries to write the WireGuard files to /usr/src/ which is read
only (I think).
Joe
--
Joe Doss
j...@solidadmin.com
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
