Dan,

Do you have the APs in public subnets or private subnets? Occasionally we see 
this problem happening in our environment as well. Currently we put APs in 
public subnets. I worked with Cisco TAC on this and we could not find anything. 
Finally TAC suggested we move APs to private subnets and we are considering 
that.

---
Dennis Xu
Network Analyst, Computing and Communication Services
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Brisson" <dbris...@uvm.edu>
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 12:31:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco APs losing CAPWAP session

Good question.  Turns out the APs use UTC time, which appears to be correct:

AP#sh clock
*17:29:03.737 UTC Wed Feb 1 2012

-dan

Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu


On 2/1/2012 12:11 PM, Craig Eyre wrote:
> Dan,
>
> What time is your controller showing? From your log messages it looks like
> its 2:16pm there? AP's have issues when the time is off between the
> controller and the ap's.
>
>
> Craig Eyre
> Network Analyst
> IT Services Department
> Mount Royal University
> 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW
> Calgary AB T2P 3T5
>
> P. 403.440.5199
> E. ce...@mtroyal.ca
>
> "The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of
> strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will."  Vincent
> T. Lombardi
>
>
>
>
> From: Dan Brisson<dbris...@uvm.edu>
> To:   WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Date: 02/01/2012 09:32 AM
> Subject:      Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco APs losing CAPWAP session
> Sent by:      The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
>              <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>
>
>
> This what we see on the AP at the time the AP disjoins:
>
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.174: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify
> Alert to 10.246.207.214:5246
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.227: %WIDS-5-DISABLED: IDS Signature is removed and
> disabled.
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.227: %CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state to DISCOVERY
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.227: %CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state to DISCOVERY
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.293: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed
> state to administratively down
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.293: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed
> state to administratively down
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.299: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed
> state to reset
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.309:  status of voice_diag_test from WLC is false
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.309: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed
> state to up
> *Feb  1 14:16:25.318: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed
> state to up
>
> -dan
>
> Dan Brisson
> Network Engineer
> University of Vermont
> (Ph) 802.656.8111
> dbris...@uvm.edu
>
>
> On 2/1/2012 10:30 AM, Mike Goebel wrote:
>> Dan, have you tried logging into the AP itself and checking the logs
>> by chance?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 2/1/2012 10:03 AM, Dan Brisson wrote:
>>> It does seem as though I've grabbed some folks attention. I sure hope it
>>> turns out to not be something simple. :)
>>>
>>> I could certainly try moving the APs around...easy enough to do,
>>> although from what we've seen, the pattern of AP drops is so totally
>>> random, hard to say if I'll see anything. At this point though, it's
>>> worth a shot.
>>> All interfaces clean and no QoS in place.
>>>
>>> Not sure if this will come through for everyone, but here's an example
>>> of what I see after an AP drops. This is from the controller, on the
>>> General tab for an AP:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -dan
>>>
>>> Dan Brisson
>>> Network Engineer
>>> University of Vermont
>>> (Ph) 802.656.8111
>>> dbris...@uvm.edu
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/1/2012 9:26 AM, Garry Peirce wrote:
>>>> I think you have some of us all getting curious! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Could you put a historically stable admin AP onto the 5508 and
>>>> vice-versa to
>>>> see if behaviors change?
>>>> Do we assume that all switchports in the path are showing they're
>>>> running
>>>> clean?
>>>> Any QoS config in place on the switches?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
>>>> [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Brisson
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 9:09 AM
>>>> To:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>>>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco APs losing CAPWAP session
>>>>
>>>> Good to know.
>>>>
>>>> The trunks are actually all 10Gig links, or 90% of them are, so
>>>> utilization
>>>> is most likely not the case, which I'm able to verify from Cacti
>>>> graphs.
>>>> The APs are connected to 3560Xs PoE switches that then uplink into
>>>> either a
>>>> 3560E-12D or directly into a 4900M where the 5508s are connected.
>>>> Certainly
>>>> can't rule out physical layer issue somewhere, although it's so wide
>>>> spread
>>>> across 2 different 5508s that we would need to have multiple issues.
>>>> The other interesting thing for us is that the 500 or so APs on our
>>>> admin
>>>> side that do not lose their CAPWAP session, join to WiSMs, not 5508s.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -dan
>>>>
>>>> Dan Brisson
>>>> Network Engineer
>>>> University of Vermont
>>>> (Ph) 802.656.8111
>>>> dbris...@uvm.edu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/31/2012 8:44 PM, Garry Peirce wrote:
>>>>> We have ~1400 (1240s->3502's) running 7.0.116 and have no such issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would guess at packet loss as well - some things you might look at:
>>>>> Are the trunks carrying user/AP traffic seem congested when the APs
>>>>> drop?
>>>>> Have you verified there are no duplex issues? It may exhibit itself
>>>>> more as traffic levels rise.
>>>>> ResHall switching significantly different than on the admin side?
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably need further topology, version, config info, but as you've a
>>>>> case open, the TAC will likely ask the same and help find the
>>>>> culprit(s)
>>>> for you.
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
>>>>> [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Brisson
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:30 AM
>>>>> To:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>>>>> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco APs losing CAPWAP session
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm curious if any Cisco users out there are experiencing or have
>>>>> experienced what we're seeing on our campus.  This past summer we
>>>>> installed 3502i's in all of our residence halls - approximately 500
>>>>> total.  Ever since the students have moved in, we will get messages
>>>>> from WCS stating that "AP XYZ" is down and disassociated from the
>>>>> controller.  When I check out the AP, the uptime is fine, but the
>>>>> "CAPWAP join time" is for like 30 seconds, or however long it took
>>>>> me to
>>>> check.
>>>>> We've tracked this and it is totally random as to what AP will drop,
>>>>> which makes troubleshooting this very tough.  The log on the AP isn't
>>>> helpful.
>>>>> I'm working with TAC who suggests that keepalives are getting missed.
>>>>> I'm not sure why that would be the case since we have another
>>>>> 500 or so APs on the admin side that very rarely drop.  Adding to
>>>>> that, when the students left for break, the AP drops stopped.  They
>>>>> came back, and sure enough, the drops start up again.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will say that the AP always joins back immediately, but for the time
>>>>> that it does drop A) I'm sure connectivity is affected in that area
>>>>> and
>>>>> B) we get an email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone experiencing this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dan Brisson
>>>>> Network Engineer
>>>>> University of Vermont
>>>>> (Ph) 802.656.8111
>>>>> dbris...@uvm.edu
>>>>>
>>>>> **********
>>>>> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>>>>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
>>>> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>>>> **********
>>>>> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>>>>> Constituent
>>>> Group discussion list can be found athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>>>
>>>> **********
>>>> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>>>> Constituent
>>>> Group discussion list can be found athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>>>
>>>> **********
>>>> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>>>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found
>>>> athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
>>> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to