Excellent notes! Jason, so you know, we have close to 30K students and we have 
been dual-stacked. This semester we collapsed our wireless core to two 6500s. 
The SUP720-3B did not work for us. We needed at least a 3BXL. We are in the 
process of upgrading our SUPs to 2T-XL to future-proof our network.

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] IPv6 on wireless experiences?

Jason,
We went through this a few years ago.  At the time, we had about 8000 IPv6 
clients on each of our 720's.  We fought with it for about a semester until we 
could replace them with SUP2T's.

I dug up some notes from 2011 and included some lessons learned/ best practices 
below.  Things may have changed since then so please consult with your SE 
before trying any of this.


  1.  ND table size-  Once you reach the max, all traffic from additional 
clients is SW processed.  We did exceed the table size, but other factors below 
actually had more of an effect on our CPU.
  2.  ND table reachability timer - The default ND reachability timer is 30 
seconds as defined by the ND RFC.  This is too aggressive for a wireless 
deployment, driving up the CPU as it tries to send out solicitations and write 
to the ND table for thousands of clients.  The table rewrite chews up CPU.  We 
played with the timers and settled on changing it to 5 minutes.  We were 
concerned about the table limit size as once the table reaches its max, as all 
traffic from additional clients is processed in SW.
  3.  Mcast - the Sup720 processes mcast in SW, this means all RA's, NS's, 
bonjour, etc. will drive your interrupt CPU high.  We started blocking L2 
multicast at the interface before it could go to the CPU
  4.  Cisco recommended that we enable IPv6 multicast on all your core routers. 
 Cisco stated that this will allow MLD snooping to handle most of the IPv6 
solicitation messages (instead of sending them to the CPU).  Sounds good in 
theory, but it had unintended consequences that forced all the mcast traffic 
that we were blocking in #2 to get punted to the CPU.  Cisco said bug.  You may 
want to follow up on this as we moved to the SUP2T
  5.  Deny ICMP redirects on your client facing interfaces.  - another measure 
to reduce demand on CPU resources.  Cisco may tell you to also deny ICMP 
unreachables.  If your running dual stack, this is a bad idea.
  6.  uRPF for IPv6 was done solely in SW on the 720.   We replaced with 
appropriate ACL's (HW based)

In short, depending on the number of IPv6 clients your expecting, you may want 
to consider another solution.   Id be happy to provide more detail if you need.


steve


From: Jason Chan <szeho.c...@utoronto.ca<mailto:szeho.c...@utoronto.ca>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 10:35 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] IPv6 on wireless experiences?

I was wondering if anyone is having issues with exceeding NDP entries number on 
routers?

I'm also about to enable IPv6 on wireless but I've been advised by Cisco to 
watch out for the NDP table size limit on our 6500 with SUP720-3B, which is 
only 15K entries.  On the IPv4 side we are slightly above 28K (out of 30K 
recommended maximum) entries on one of our routers.

Jason

--
Jason Chan
Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions,
Information + Technology Services
University of Toronto
Phone: (416)946-5233
Email: szeho.c...@utoronto.ca<mailto:szeho.c...@utoronto.ca>



********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to