Thank you Eriks and Curtis, this information is very helpful. We aren’t using Packetfence, but rather a mix of ClearPass and a customized FreeRADIUS. As we move from a relatively small numbers of eduroam users on campus to actively promoting it for on-campus use we have been running various models to predict load and we don’t have a good way to determine the load capacity of the FreeRADIUS portion of the architecture.
Anyone else who has thoughts or suggestions, please feel free to chime in. David David Morton Director, Mobile Communications Service Owner: Wi-Fi, Mobile & HuskyTV University of Washington dmor...@u.washington.edu<mailto:dmor...@u.washington.edu> On Jul 19, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Eriks Rugelis <er...@yorku.ca<mailto:er...@yorku.ca>> wrote: Curtis K. Larsen wrote: Nice slides. This is pretty similar to what we do. We're also using PacketFence/FreeRADIUS. The graphing of the authentications is key to understanding/scaling things in my opinion. Actually, with respect to our current deployment architecture, we are standing on your shoulders. I want to thank you for that and also for driving Inverse to implementing the activity and performance graphs in Packetfence. I cannot overstate how valuable we find the ability to track and correlate authentication workload, authentication server performance and back-end (Active Directory) server performance! --- Eriks Rugelis Manager, Network Development, University Information Technology York University, Toronto ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
