We have both Cisco and Aruba here in our consortium, and neither is perfect,
although I’ve witnessed more impactful (show stopper) bugs on the Aruba.
When you are the market leader by 3:1, it makes sense that you’re going to see
more posts about code quality. You’ll also have more people willing to talk
about their issues with the market leader.
Jeff
On 8/15/16, 6:18 AM, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of Osborne, Bruce W (Network Services)"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU on behalf of bosbo...@liberty.edu> wrote:
Aruba definitely has superior code quality!
This vendor-neutral list has many threads debating which Cisco versions
have the least bugs.
You see very few such threads for HPE/Aruba even though they have a large
segment of the wireless market.
Bruce Osborne
Wireless Engineer
IT Network Oprations - Wireless
(434) 592-4229
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
Training Champions for Christ since 1971
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee H Badman [mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Wireless Mobility
And that code quality!
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Jeffrey D. Sessler
<j...@scrippscollege.edu> wrote:
>
> Really Bruce? LOL
>
> Thank you for the advice, but I for one will stick with
class-leading/unique technology innovations in the Cisco stuff, like DBS
(dynamic bandwidth selection), CleanAir, and FRA (Flexible Radio Assignment)
just to name a few.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On 8/11/16, 4:39 AM, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group
Listserv on behalf of Osborne, Bruce W (Network Services)"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU on behalf of bosbo...@liberty.edu> wrote:
>
> Perhaps you should consider Aruba Networks / HP Enterprise.
>
> They eliminated "burned-in" licenses on controllers but if you replace
one of them, they will generate licenses for your replacement, at least in our
experience.
>
> We do not purchase support on most of our APs since they have a
lifetime warranty anyway. For some unusual or mission-critical applications
(point-to-point for instance) we purchase the hardware support to get quicker
replacements. We *do* pay support the licenses (AP & other) on our controllers
but central licensing helps us maximize the value of our licenses.
>
>
> Bruce Osborne
> Wireless Engineer
> IT Network Oprations - Wireless
>
> (434) 592-4229
>
> LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
> Training Champions for Christ since 1971
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Newton [mailto:m...@leicester.ac.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 5:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Wireless Mobility
>
>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:46:28PM +0000, Jeffrey D. Sessler wrote:
>> On limiting the 8510 to 3000 WAPs, and then adding another 8510 pair.
>> Since the 8500 series are subject to Cisco’s new and improved RTU
>> licensing, instead of adding another pair of 8510’s, purchase a pair
>> of 8540’s and move the 8510’s 3000 AP licenses to the new 8540 along
>> with the additional licenses.
>
> Except that Cisco don't treat the 8510 and the 8540 as the same
"family", so they won't let you move AP licences between them.
> We've just been through this, and I raised the same question...
> "they're 85xx, so we can just move our 8510 AP licences to the new
> 8540 hardware". Which Cisco confirmed that we couldn't. :(
>
> Why they couldn't call it the 9540 (or even the 8640) to make that
clear I have no idea, but then there are 7500/5520 controllers in the same
families, so it's a right mess. I *think* I worked out that the Flex7500 and
8510 are in one family, and the 5520/8540/vWLC are in another, but I'm not
entirely sure. It was certainly implied that we could move the licences to some
different controllers, just not the 8540.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/flex-7500-series-wireless-controllers/qa_c67-713536.html
> seems to also imply you can't even move from e.g. a 5520 to a 8540,
only between exactly the same model.
>
> And of course you also can't move the base licences from a controller
to any other controller. Only the adder licences are transferrable. So if you
bought a controller with 1000 base licenses, and a couple of 1000 adder
licences to get up to 3000, on the 2000 extra can be moved.
>
> Really, it would be better if Cisco stopped the AP licences nonsense
completely and just added £50 to the cost of each AP. But I guess the current
way makes them a lot more money...
>
>> I mention this because the zero-AP 8510 and 8540 are the exact same
>> list price, so it doesn’t make a lot of sense to get the 8510’a. Oh,
>> and instead of smartnet on four 8510 controllers, it’s just smartnet
>> on two 8540’s.
>
> Charging maintenance on controller AP licences is also dodgy IMO (or
"good business practise", from Cisco's point of view), and definitely something
to watch out for if you have lots of spare controller AP licences around.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> --
> Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <m...@leicester.ac.uk>
>
> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services,
> University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
>
> For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ith...@le.ac.uk>
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
>
>
>
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
