The article says 1 watt.

Also if you look at the pictures, you'll see a poletop amp and DC injector.


-- 
Jeff King, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/13/2002


On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:11:09 -0600, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>FCC ptp rules in 2.4 say you're allowed up to 30dBm tx power with
>6dBi
>of antenna gain,
>and must reduce tx power by 1 dBm for every 3 dBi of antenna gain
>over
>6.
>
>Assume that the dish pictured is 30dBi (difficult, but not
>impossible):
>30 - (30-6)/3 = 22 dBm of tx power allowed.
>
>The Lucent/Orinoco/Agere cards used put up 18dBm, so I'd say they're
>
>running inside the rules.
>
>They must be running KarlNet/Turbo Cell on that link.  Otherwise,
>the
>SIFS/ACK timing wouldn't work.   If they
>are, then its not 802.11 (much less 802.11b!)  While HPWREN never
>claims it as an 802.11(b) link, lots of other
>places (/., the original poster here) do.
>
>Jim
>p.s. note that you can run up to 23dBm (200mW) of tx power with a
>27dBi
>antenna (again, ptp rules).
>
>On Wednesday, Nov 13, 2002, at 15:50 US/Central, Daniel Kluge wrote:
>
>>I just stumbled over an article, that Hans-Werner Braun at HPWREN
>>upped
>>the ante a little bit for point-to-point links. They are doing 72
>>miles
>>over water using 40 inch grid antennas and apparently standard Wi-
>>Fi
>>cards
>>
>>You can read it in HPWREN's press-release here:
>>http://hpwren.ucsd.edu/news/021101.html
>>
>>Or the following article (which has some errors in it):
>>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=77&ncid=77&e=2&u=/m
>>c/
>>20021113/tc_mc/san_diego_wireless_net_installs_72_mile_2_4_ghz_link
>>
>>Cheers,
>>-daniel
>>--
>>UNIX-looney for hire
>>--
>>general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
>>[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>
>--
>general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
>[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless





--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to