[courtesy of BAT list; original source: Wi-Fi Planet]

Message: 8
   Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 22:44:22 -0000
   From: "12/5 Wi-Fi Planet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Full steam ahead for Wi-Fi aboard trains

Published Friday, December 5, 2003, in Wi-Fi Planet

Full Steam Ahead for Wi-Fi

By Gerry Blackwell 

Silicon Valley commuters can now surf the Web at near DSL speeds as 
they roll to work on the train thanks to an innovative Wi-Fi-based 
access service. Wireless-savvy commuters started asking for the 
service three years ago. They finally got when it launched on 
October 15.

It's being trialed by the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority 
(CCJPA) <http://www.amtrakcapitols.com>, an intergovernmental agency 
that oversees Amtrak-operated commuter trains running to and from 
Sacramento, Santa Clara and San Jose in California. For at least the 
first month, the service will be free. 

The technology comes from PointShot Wireless, a start-up 
headquartered in Ottawa, Canada that specializes in Wi-Fi for trains 
and other vehicles. 

PointShot <http://www.pointshotwireless.com> has two other trials
up and running. One, launched in the summer, is on the Altamont 
Commuter Express (ACE) <http://www.acerail.com> running between 
Stockton and San Jose, also in California. The other, which 
PointShot claims is the first in-train Wi-Fi service in North 
America, is operated by telco Bell Canada on a ViaRail 
<http://www.viarail.ca/en_index.html> route between Toronto and 
Montreal. 

PointShot also recently announced $1 million in Series A funding 
from institutional investors to help the company expand into the 
European market.

In Europe, meanwhile, Icomera AB, a Swedish firm using technology 
similar to PointShot's, claims to have been the first in-train Wi-Fi 
service anywhere. It launched a trial early this year on a route 
between Gothenburg, Sweden and Copenhagen, Denmark operated by 
Scandinavian rail company Linx AB <http://www.linx.se>. 

Icomera has since signed a five-year deal with Linx and has also 
sold its technology to GNER <http://www.gner.co.uk>, a British rail 
company.

The PointShot trial on the heavily-traveled CCJPA service is the 
company's highest profile to date. One passenger car is outfitted 
with Wi-Fi gear, which is moved from route to route on a daily 
basis. Riders anxious to compute while they commute can look at the 
authority's Web site to find out where the Wi-Fi car is on any given 
day.

The service has generally been received well, though not 
uncritically. PointShot, which is managing the trial, caps the 
number of simultaneous log-ons at 20. Peak usage so far has been 
about 14. That's on one train car, and it's only a couple of weeks 
into the trial. This would seem to suggest there is a fair amount
of demand.

The CCJPA already knew there was demand, though. It started hearing 
from Silicon Valley customers about Wi-Fi three years ago, and more 
recently has received frequent e-mails. The agency prides itself on 
its customer focus, and does onboard surveys of passengers to get 
ideas for improving service. It heard demand for Internet service
in the surveys as well.

"They definitely like that it's available now," says Jim Allison, 
senior planner with the CCJPA. "But some of their VPNs [virtual 
private networks] don't work apparently -- probably an issue of 
latency, PointShot tells us."

"These users also like things to be as fast as they can possibly
be. So while some are just happy to have it at any speed, some are 
saying, 'Gee, this is great, but why can't it be faster?'"

There are reasons for that. The PointShot technology uses Wi-Fi in 
the train, but the backhaul is provided by a satellite connection 
for the down link and cellular for the up link. That will slow 
things down, especially juggling communications links at 70 mph.

PointShot president and CEO Shawn Griffin says actual throughput is 
typically "somewhere between a fast dial-up connection and a slow 
DSL connection." Since starting the trials, the company has 
developed caching and compression techniques for improving 
throughput.

At the core of the PointShot solution is the on-train RailPoint 
server, a combination access point, Web server, caching and 
compression engine and intelligent backhaul switcher. A cable runs 
from the server to a roof-mounted antenna enclosure, which includes 
satellite, cellular and Wi-Fi antennas.

When a train is in the station, and the station has a useable Wi-Fi 
service -- none in PointShot's trials currently has - the RailPoint 
server will use the Wi-Fi antenna to bridge users to the in-station 
service. As the train pulls away and that connection degrades, 
RailPoint automatically switches to satellite and cellular. 

If the train goes through an area where there is no cellular 
coverage, RailPoint can temporarily switch to satellite for both
up and down links, and when the train goes into a tunnel, blocking 
satellite reception, it can switch to cellular in both directions.

PointShot has signed deals with other rail services for trials but 
hasn't announced them yet. It is marketing the RailPoint solution 
all over the world, Griffin says.

The company also has a second product, MotionPoint, designed to 
provide similar functionality in executive buses and recreational 
vehicles (RVs). PointShot trialed MotionPoint on the campaign and 
press buses of ex-premier Ernie Eves in the recent provincial 
election in Ontario.

It didn't help. Eves lost the election, but everybody thought the
Wi-Fi access was great, Griffin says, especially members of the 
press. PointShot has already recruited resellers to sell the 
MotionPoint product to RV owners, many of whom want high-speed 
Internet access wherever they go, he says.

PointShot does not have a monopoly on the CCJPA trains. It first 
approached the authority about operating a trial. The authority then 
declared that in the interests of fair play, it would open up its 
trains for 12 months to any vendor who wanted to run a Wi-Fi trial. 

So far, two additional trials are in planning stages, one headed 
even by Cisco Systems Inc. and Verizon Communications. These trials 
will run concurrently with the PointShot trial.

"Our hope," says Allison, "is to eventually put out a request for 
qualifications and receive several bids." 

In fact, the authority expects to issue the RFQ by July or August 
2004 and have commercial service up and running on its trains by 
October. 

It will probably take several years for it to be rolled out to all 
train routes, though. Silicon Valley commuter trains, for obvious 
reasons, will get first priority. 

Much else has yet to be worked out. At this point, the CCJPA is 
thinking of adopting a concession model. The winning bidder would
be given access to the authority's trains to install equipment and 
operate the Wi-Fi service. 

The service provider might pay a concession fee and/or share 
revenues with the authority. Or the CCJPA might waive fees an/or 
revenue sharing in return for bandwidth and software that would
let onboard staff use the service for online ticketing and other 
applications. 

PointShot says it is working on rail company applications.

Pricing for the second semi-commercial phase of the PointShot-
Capitol Corridor trial is expected to be comparable with pricing of 
the service offered by T-Mobile in Starbucks coffee shop, Allison 
says. Pricing of an eventual commercial service has yet to be 
considered. 

Allison notes that the state, which provides all of the CCJPA's 
funding, might get involved and set permissible parameters on either 
or both of price and service levels. 

Meanwhile, the authority is also working on the Wi-Fi-on-trains 
initiative with the California Center for Innovative Transportation 
<http://www.calccit.org>, a task group funded by The University of 
California at Berkeley and the California Department of 
Transportation (Caltrans).

Satellite and cellular, with their obvious drawbacks, are not the 
only ways to provide backhaul for in-train Wi-Fi services, Griffin 
says. With modern antenna technology, it's possible to extend 
coverage from Wi-Fi access points up to two miles, so it may be 
possible in future for train systems to get signal from Wireless 
Internet Services Providers (WISPs) along the route. 

However, it's "capitally prohibitive" -- at least for now -- to 
think of deploying access points all along a rail route just to 
provide in-train service, Griffin says.

Wi-Fi on the train makes a lot of sense. Commuters are trapped. Some 
at least would like to put that time to better use. This is one way 
to do it. 

One question, a perennial in any discussion of public access Wi-Fi, 
is, can anyone make money at this? Time will tell. 


[BATN: See related:

ACE extends free access to onboard Wi-Fi web link
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/15189  

Amtrak Capitol Wi-Fi internet trial begins today
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/14320

ACE on-board Wi-Fi trial going smoothly so far
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/13782  

ACE tests on-board Wi-Fi internet access, classes
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/13658  

ACE, Capitols to offer Wi-Fi; Caltrain may follow
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/13390  

ACE train commuters to enjoy wireless internet
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/13335  

ACE, Capitols to test in-train Wi-Fi internet access
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/13305  

Amtrak Capitols to test Wi-Fi internet access
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/13216  

ACE trial will offer onboard Wi-Fi internet access
http://groups.yahoo.com/message/13186 ]
  

--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to