e' strano.. perche' io sto usando ipv6 per fare i test quindi il path mtu discovery dovrebbe funzionare e in effetti riducendo l'mtu a 1280 e disabilitando cipher ottengo un misero raddoppio della banda quando va bene...
Il 03 luglio 2011 14:37, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: > Quello che va meglio :) > Ce ne saranno una dozzina nel kernel, aggiungili. > Così, a naso, vista la natura particolare del canale, un algo abbastanza > tollerante alle perdite/timeout. > Ma questo solo per capire sa cambia qualcosa o siamo sempre con gli stessi > valori.. > > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 14:23, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: >> >> non so quale usa di default tu quale mi consigli di usare? >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 14:18, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: >> > Bene, ora puoi ripetere le prove cambiando l'algoritmo di controllo di >> > congestione sul client iperf. >> > Cosa stai usando ora? Reno? >> > >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 14:09, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> > ha scritto: >> >> >> >> altri test fissando la quantita' >> >> >> >> [ 4] 0.0-62.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 270 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-55.3 sec 2.00 MBytes 304 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-64.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 261 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-58.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 285 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-99.6 sec 2.00 MBytes 169 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-96.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 174 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-89.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 187 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-66.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 253 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-99.9 sec 2.00 MBytes 161 Kbits/sec >> >> [ 4] 0.0-88.1 sec 2.00 MBytes 190 Kbits/sec >> >> >> >> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:57, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >> >> scritto: >> >> > senza tinc la configurazione rimane uguale ma il traffico al posto di >> >> > passare dal tunnel via internet passa solo attraverso i link wireless >> >> > >> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 13:51, Antonio Quartulli <or...@autistici.org> ha >> >> > scritto: >> >> >> On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 01:48:37 +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: >> >> >>> il test e' sempre PC( iperf -c ) <-- cavo lan --> Piconstation ( >> >> >>> btman-adv + tinc )<-- tinc ---> PC( batman-adv + tinc + iperf -s) >> >> >> >> >> >> anche senza TINC la configurazione rimane uguale? scusa ma non ho >> >> >> capito >> >> >> questo daalle mail precedenti >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo >> >> >>> >deviati.. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> quei test non sono fatti in parallelo sono fatti in modo >> >> >>> sequenziale >> >> >>> quindi volta per volta c'e' ne e' attivo solo uno >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:40, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: >> >> >>> > Magari se scegliessi un test "unico" sarebbe anche meglio, >> >> >>> > usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo >> >> >>> > deviati.. >> >> >>> > Se non mi dicessi della CPU a palla, guardando sta roba ti direi >> >> >>> > che >> >> >>> > è >> >> >>> > congestione.. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:31, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> > ha scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> altra serie di test >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.8 sec 384 KBytes 167 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.5 sec 384 KBytes 180 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.0 sec 384 KBytes 157 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.1 sec 384 KBytes 149 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-32.3 sec 384 KBytes 97.3 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.8 sec 384 KBytes 151 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-27.7 sec 256 KBytes 75.8 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.8 sec 256 KBytes 96.3 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.3 sec 512 KBytes 294 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.0 sec 512 KBytes 299 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-37.6 sec 512 KBytes 112 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.7 sec 512 KBytes 224 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.3 sec 384 KBytes 148 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.9 sec 640 KBytes 293 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-24.8 sec 512 KBytes 169 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-16.4 sec 384 KBytes 192 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.4 sec 384 KBytes 147 Kbits/sec >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> ho spento dnsmasq che non serviva a niente e andiamo di poco ma >> >> >>> >> meglio >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:16, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >> >> >>> >> scritto: >> >> >>> >> > Il sintomo è abbastanza chiaro, ma dubito sia colpa della CPU >> >> >>> >> > o >> >> >>> >> > meglio, >> >> >>> >> > secondo me qualcosa >> >> >>> >> > è stata scritta male, 100Kbps sono davvero ridicoli. A maggior >> >> >>> >> > ragione >> >> >>> >> > quando ste cpu hanno anche qualche set dedicato >> >> >>> >> > alla crittografia simmetrica... >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:04, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> >> > ha scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> ma il problema sembra proprio l'eccessivo utilizzo di cpu per >> >> >>> >> >> la >> >> >>> >> >> vpn >> >> >>> >> >> perche' stando in ssh sulla picostation mentre c'e' traffico >> >> >>> >> >> che >> >> >>> >> >> passa >> >> >>> >> >> sulla vpn diventa completamente unresponsive non sente >> >> >>> >> >> nemmeno >> >> >>> >> >> ctrl+c >> >> >>> >> >> sulla shell... quando il traffico finisce mi esegue tutto >> >> >>> >> >> quello >> >> >>> >> >> che >> >> >>> >> >> gli avevo mandato nel fratempo >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:01, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>> >> >> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >> >> >>> >> >> scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal >> >> >>> >> >> >> PC)? >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > dovrei installarmi anche batman-adv sul pc... >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 12:58, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >> >> >>> >> >> > scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >> E' chiaro che non può essere il tuo upstream, >> >> >>> >> >> >> ma sei certo che il collo di bottiglia non sia nella >> >> >>> >> >> >> capacità >> >> >>> >> >> >> di sta >> >> >>> >> >> >> rete >> >> >>> >> >> >> mesh tunnellata? >> >> >>> >> >> >> Hai provato a lanciare 2 iperf in parallelo? >> >> >>> >> >> >> Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal >> >> >>> >> >> >> PC)? >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:34, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>> >> >> >> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> >> >> >> ha scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> la picostation a e la z sono la stessa picostation... >> >> >>> >> >> >>> dalla >> >> >>> >> >> >>> picostation a posso decidere se accendere tinc e quindi >> >> >>> >> >> >>> far >> >> >>> >> >> >>> passare >> >> >>> >> >> >>> traffico mesh su internet oppure se usare solo i link >> >> >>> >> >> >>> wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> dal computer pocco decidere sia di usare la picostation >> >> >>> >> >> >>> come >> >> >>> >> >> >>> gw sia >> >> >>> >> >> >>> di >> >> >>> >> >> >>> usare il router adsl >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> le casistiche quindi sono 3 >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via internet senza tinc >500KB/s >> >> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh senza tinc ~ 20Kb/s >> >> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh tunnellata su internet con tinc ~100Kb/s >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:27, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >> >> >>> >> >> >>> scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Fammi capire: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > - tra le tua pico(A) e quella(Z) con l'adsl ci sono >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > diversi nodi >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > e >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > con >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > iperf >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > hai risultati di 20Kbps (A->Z) in L3 puro ? Mentre se >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > usi >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > tinc va >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > a >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > 100Kbps? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > - chi sono gli end-point tinc? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:12, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > ha scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> senza tinc praticamente non c'e' connettivita' ( a >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> volte >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> va ma >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> roba >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> tipo 20k perche' sono un sacco di op alcuni dei quali >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> fanno >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> schifo...) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> se invece faccio iperf passando per internet senza >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> tinc >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> ottengo >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> risultati sempre sopra i 500KB/s >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:01, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> ha >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Hai gia controllato i valori tra le 2 pico con e >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > senza >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > tinc? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:45, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > ha scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> iperf -c su computer che usa una picostation come >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> gateway -> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Picostation con tinc <- adsl 8 megabit -> iperf >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --server su >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> eigenlab.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 11:33, Darkman >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> <dark...@darkman.it> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ha >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > 100kbps mi pare davvero troppo poco anche per >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > quelle >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > cessonanocpu. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Come li hai ottenuti sti valori? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:10, Gioacchino >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Mazzurco >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > ha scritto: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Ciao a tutti! >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Facendo dei test mi sono accorto che le vpn con >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> tinc >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> installato >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> sui >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> nodi ci vanno max a 100k anche se la banda >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> dell'adsl e' >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> molta >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> di >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu'... ho cominciato a cercare ed ho letto che >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> la >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> causa >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e' >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> probabilmente la CPU che non ce la fa a fare >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> decryption >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu' velocemente di cosi' >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> leggendo il man di tinc ho trovato questo >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Cipher = cipher (blowfish) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> The symmetric cipher algorithm used >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> to >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encrypt >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> UDP >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packets. Any cipher supported by OpenSSL is >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> recognised. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Fur†>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> thermore, specifying "none" will >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> turn >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> off >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packet >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption. It is best to use only those >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> ciphers >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> which >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> support >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> CBC mode. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> mettendo none dovrebbe essere disabilitata l' >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption e >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> quindi >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> avere piu' banda, il meccanismo degli host con >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> il >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> file con >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> la >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> chiave >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> pubblica continua a funzionare disabilitando la >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cifratura, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> soprattutto bastera' aggiungere quell'opzione li >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> oppure >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> bisogna >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cambiare altre conf? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Antonio Quartulli >> >> >> >> >> >> ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. >> >> >> Ernesto "Che" Guevara >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wireless mailing list >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@ml.ninux.org > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
