LOL Frank! Give'em their eggs over hard cause they'll never take it
the easy way!
I agree with your sediments!

On 11/7/05, Frank Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just passing on some information that may be of interest to anyone.
> Entitlement vs. laws, and a company's TOS/AUP I'm sure are all involved in
> one form or another, as with anything else concerning the use of a network
> to access the Internet or other service.
>
> As far as I am concerned, this whole Internet and who controls (owns) it, is
> just getting dumber and dumber by the minute. Congress, the FCC, state and
> local governments, special interest groups, the Bell's, xLEC's etc, etc,
> etc., can all suck eggs.
>
>
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Frank,
> > I have a problem with the second item listed on the challenge myself. It
> > states:
> >
> > 2) Consumers are entitled to run applications and services of their
> > choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement
> > <http://www.cybertelecom.org/security/Calea.htm>;
> >
> > I do not allow my broadband subscribers to use their connection for
> > applications or services which act as a server or daemon for delivering
> > content to others. Broadband networks are not designed to be content
> > delivery networks from the customer end generally. In the case of
> > wireless broadband access,  customers can cause network problems if they
> > allow thousands of open ports to a popular file download. I have seen
> > this many times and I have provisions in my AUP which allow me to turn
> > customers off who cause network problems from trying to use broadband as
> > a content delivery mechanism. I welcome other thoughts but I believe we
> > need to have the ability to stop abuses of a network which can cause us
> > problems. With that said I agree that there needs to be some commitment
> > from operators to allow access to their networks for free and open
> > competition. I just do not agree that there can be no limits to what we
> > can or cannot allow on the network. Especially when some things can harm
> > network functionality.
> > John Scrivner
> >
> >
>
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--
-RickG
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to