Agreed, but if you can do it for 2 grand why spend 12? If the ebay
radios are reliable, then skip the fiber in my opinion. Might as well
take the 10 grand that is left over and install another 25 subs. ;)
George wrote:
I do not believe you laying fiber is at all a bad sign to your customers.
You have been on the cutting edge of technology with wireless, why
would you not do the fiber to continue on with your cutting edge
technology deployment.
It almost sounds like you believe wireless is better than fiber, but
we all know fiber/wireless is the end game.
If you are fiber and wireless, you are the cutting edge leader.
My opinion.
George
John Scrivner wrote:
I need some feedback from the collective. I am looking for a
backhaul radio link for my main tower. 5.8 Ghz is fully utilized at
this location. It is only a 1500 foot shot. I would like at least 50
meg full or 100 meg half duplex. I would like this solution to be
under $8K or so. 5.3 Ghz is pretty open here. Does a solution exist?
I can lay fiber for about $12K or so. I am considering doing that but
I think laying fiber for my main connection when I am a fixed
broadband wireless provider sends the wrong message to my potential
customers when Charter is going all over town selling fiber
connections. I welcome your feedback.
Scriv
--
Brian Rohrbacher
Reliable Internet, LLC
www.reliableinter.net
Cell 269-838-8338
"Caught up in the Air" 1 Thess. 4:17
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
