Does the 3db SNR still apply when using 2X mode? I was under the impression that 2X requires 10db
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Kurt Fankhauser > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:20 PM > To: 'WISPA General List' > Subject: RE: [WISPA] Interested in your experience.. > > If your concerned about noise consider Motorola, it has excellent noise > rejection, it only needs somewhere around 3db above the noise for your > throughput. > > Kurt Fankhauser > WAVELINC > 114 S. Walnut St. > Bucyrus, OH 44820 > 419-562-6405 > www.wavelinc.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Chadd Thompson > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:31 AM > To: 'WISPA General List' > Subject: RE: [WISPA] Interested in your experience.. > > We have a lot of fence rows in this area so 900 is going to be a > necessary > evil like it or not. I tried using 5.7 Trango for a few installs early > on > and just couldn't get any range out of it in this area, and the noise > floor > is fairly high in 5.x around here. > > It seems like more and more people are starting up in this area all the > time > and the noise floor continues to rise, I would like to find a solution > that > does well in noisy environments and maybe even something that uses the > spectrum a bit more efficiently than standard 802.xx. > > Our FHSS has been great as far as noise has been concerned. We have had > two > competitors come in and install DSSS 2.4 within a few blocks of our FHSS > and > we never saw any difference. They have done installs shooting directly > over > the top of our customers on the same polarity and again it just keeps > plugging along. The others in the area definitely don't give a hoot > about us > and how could possible affect our service or customers so I need to do > what > it takes to keep our network as robust as possible. I wouldn't mind > sticking > with FHSS but I just don't see it giving us room to stretch our legs as > customers expect faster and faster connections. > > It is starting to work out for us though because we are starting to get > calls from their customers inquiring about switching over to our service > based off of recommendations from their neighbors. > > Thanks, > Chadd > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 1:02 PM > To: 'WISPA General List' > Subject: RE: [WISPA] Interested in your experience.. > > Is foliage a problem in your area? Sounds like your using a lot of 900 > gear. If foliage is not a problem you might want to look at 2.4 or > possibly 5.7 gear. > > Kurt Fankhauser > WAVELINC > 114 S. Walnut St. > Bucyrus, OH 44820 > 419-562-6405 > www.wavelinc.com > > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: > 1/18/2006 > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 01/16/2006 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 01/16/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
