So that's a no then Tom ;) Using various bandwidth test tools (such as the one builtin to Mikrotik) from/to multiple source/destinations you can generate all sorts of traffic profiles. You can decide on the size of the packets, layer 4, direction and even bandwidth so I'd say it's very possible to set-up a test environment that isn't too far of real world. Anyone else tested?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom DeReggi Sent: 14 June 2006 03:13 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device > Anyone compared a routed solution with > a Mikrotik bridged solution for delay/jitter? Good question. But the problem there is creating a real world test environment. Convergence, can be tested somewhat accurately in low network utilization situations. To adequately test Jitter/Delay you really need to load the network, as that is when the jitter and sparatic latency happens. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:02 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device > The delay in switching a packet at hardware is less than the delay in > routing a packet at software. This is 1 of the reasons that Cisco created > the G"S"R and why an MPL"S" switched network is fast than a plain routed > network. > > I'm not too interested in convergence times as we only have very minimal > outages so RSTP should suffice. How fast a packet can traverse our network > on the other hand is important so that we can reliably run VoIP and other > delay/jitter sensitive applications. Anyone compared a routed solution > with > a Mikrotik bridged solution for delay/jitter? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matt Liotta > Sent: 13 June 2006 13:26 > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device > > Paul Hendry wrote: > >>We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for >>the core network but the unknown quantity seems to be if there are any >>latency or speed issues related to the move. A "true" switched network is >>faster than a routed network as the switching is done at a hardware level >>but in Mikrotik I believe both switching and routed is done in software. >>What have you seen? >> >> >> > Faster in what way? Certainly, a routed network is going to beat a > switched network in terms of covergence speed. > > -Matt > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 12/06/2006 > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 12/06/2006 > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.4/363 - Release Date: 13/06/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.4/363 - Release Date: 13/06/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
